Surface charging was an issue for insulating surfaces when using high
beam intensities (10
particles s
cm
).
Due to the positive primary ions used an insulating surface would
charge up positively. Surface charging could easily be identified
by comparing the spatial distribution of the reflected neutral and
the reflected negatively charged particles. A positively charged surface
would bend the maxima in the angular distribution for the negatively
charged particles towards the surface. This was an important problem
mainly for MgO(100). By placing a filament emitting electrons close
to the surface, local surface charges could be removed. However this
procedure made it impossible to accurately determine the secondary
electron yield for this surfaces. The additional free electrons could
not interfere with the scattering measurements because electrons with
energies lower than 150eV were hindered from reaching the MCPs by
the first grid of the retarding potential analyzer RPA set to a potential
of -150V.